Is Bush a Well-Meaning Dupe?
Does It Really Make Any Difference?
By: Kevin Tuma
It is now the eleventh hour before Police State America. Less than one year
after the World Trade Center attacks, the Federal government--ordinarily
plodding and slow, when it comes to mundane matters--is speeding us down the
fast track to military government on greased rails. We have the Office of
Homeland Security. Federalized airport screeners. Laws that give the police
unbelievable authority to snoop and intrude, without search warrants. There
is a movement toward a National ID card, which will probably be insidiously
pushed through in the form of state Driver's Licenses. New tracking devices
with microchips that are meant to be inserted under human skin. Military
tribunals. Plans for forced vaccinations of entire cities. Secret police.
There is even talk of legalizing torture. Concentration camps and gulags may
be on next month's agenda. One shudders in anticipation of what will be
Of course, many people are rationalizing and softening the blow of this
new-wave fascism by saying that its creators, most especially President
Bush, are 'well-meaning'. And that the dangers from these militaristic,
aggressive 'security' measures are down the road. This is also a
rationalization, because it implies that we still have time to change
things. The dangers are already hanging over our heads.
Certainly, it is possible that George W. Bush could be a well-meaning
ignoramus. This possibility has been evident since 9-11, as we have watched
him stammer his way through abortive sentences in front of blue-collar
firefighters and Police chiefs who can speak much better than he can.
Watching Bush with a microphone, attempting to speak off-the-cuff in front
of a crowd, is downright painful. He often lapses into sub-grammatic
gibberish that is impossible to decipher, even on paper. And one gets the
impression that the reason this is the case is because--as he falters to
remember some pre-rehearsed speech line---he's not even vaguely familiar
with what he is talking about.
It's entirely conceivable that Bush--a living monument to nepotism in
political form--does not realize what he is doing as the 'company man' for
the New World Order. He may not understand that his recent proposal of 24
million civilian informants in the "TIPS" plan was a spectacular gesture
toward totalitarianism. He may not realize that the "USA-Patriot Act" is a
monstrous abrogation of the Bill of Rights, unprecedented in American
history. He may be blithely unaware that Federalizing the police is a
violation of the doctrine of Posse Comitatus. In fact, it's highly unlikely
that Bush can even spell 'Posse Comitatus', let alone cite the historical
concept behind the phrase.
Yes, it is possible that many Bush-league Republicans, even at the top, are
well-meaning. We all remember Ronald Reagan. And, make no mistake--there is
certainly a great deal at risk in the "War On Terror". Those of us who shake
our fists on the political sidelines often forget to think through the
dangers that a serious war between the US and Islam could represent.
Suppose, for example, that the worst were to happen---that Islamic suicide
bombers might decide to send their souls to Allah by exploding a
thermonuclear weapon in New York City. It would be a horrendous blow to the
United States, even if a very small fraction of the citizens of that city
were killed. New York City is the center of the US economy. If the city were
destroyed, it would have a catastrophic ripple effect throughout our system.
We would be plunged into a depression darker than the one of the 1930s.
Utter chaos would result...and that would be from only one errant nuclear
It's entirely possible that those at the top, who are cranking out one
fascistic police state plan after another, are desperately attempting to
stop something like that from happening. It's also possible that their
refusal to deal with the issue logically--by racially profiling Arabs and
leaving ordinary folk alone--could be because they are incompetent,
bureaucratic, effete, and cowardly. We are, after all, talking about
Republican politicians here. The "Patriot Act", the Gestapo-like Office of
Homeland Security, the proposed National ID card, the proposed TIPS
plan--all could be sincere attempts to avert disaster, and their flaws could
be attributed to constitutional illiteracy and a lack of common sense. It's
even possible that all these things may be motivated by fear of public
safety; it may not be the malfeasance or conspiratorial scheming to destroy
our liberties that it appears to be on the surface.
But the truth is that all of this really doesn't matter. The government has
absolutely no authority to immolate the Bill of Rights for any reason--good
or bad; sincere or treasonous. A government that tramples the US
Constitution roughshod is an illegal and illicit government. And if the
constitutional abrogators are ignorant of what they are doing? Ignorance of
the Law is no excuse. A judge will tell the common citizen that for the
tiniest infraction. It applies equally to the Powerful and the Arrogant.
And as for the catastrophic risks? We have lived under them for fifty years,
through the Cold War and the age of nuclear proliferation. Indeed, the
risks, even today, that Russia or China might nuke one of our cities are
just as viable as any possible terrorism the Muslims might inflict. The
Federal government should take action, if it really wants to protect the
American people, by developing a valid civil defense system. Instead, the
government is using every possible excuse of danger to take away our
constitutional rights. Is this due to incompetence, or evil? Does it really
Twenty-eight years ago, when liberals were undermining the Presidency of
Richard Nixon, we heard a great deal of pontification about the idea that
the "President should not be above the Law". It was a good concept.
Unfortunately, this was turned on its head by the Senate's refusal to remove
Bill Clinton from office. A dangerous precedent was set. We will now have a
new breed of Presidents who throw their weight around like Roman Emperors.
Bush is one of them. The fact that he is dense as a cinder block does not
change matters any. Nor does it matter whether he is "well-meaning"--or not.
He is doing great harm.
We are rapidly reaching the point where we must all choose whether we are
going to ignore the laws of the land--because, certainly, our elective
rulers are doing so, and they are drunk with power. The Constitution is the
legal foundation of this country--it is the Law. Any President who willfully
attempts to destroy the legal foundations of the Constitution is in
violation of the Law. A Congress that rubber-stamps such abuses is also in
violation of the Law. And black-garbed Federal police who enforce such
abrogations, who are "just following orders", are in violation of the Law as
When the government ignores its own Law, sets itself above the Law, and
denies its own citizens the protections of the Law...we have very little
left to lose.
Kevin Tuma is an editorial cartoonist for CNSNews.com and a regular columnist for Ether Zone.
Kevin Tuma can be reached at Delcomico@attbi.com
|When honest people who hold strong opinions come together, it is natural that they state their opinions, and that those opinions occasionally clash. The articles that you see on this website represent the opinion of the writers, and are not the official opinion of this party. To see the official party position on any question, the reader is referred to the Party Platform.|
Permission to reprint/republish granted, as long as you include the name of our site, the author,and our URL. www.cptexas.org. All CP Texas reports, and all editorials are property of The Constitution Party of Texas © 2002 (unless otherwise noted).
Previous Articles by Kevin Tuma